# Play.ht vs. OpenAI Text-to-Speech The best way to compare Play.ht vs. OpenAI Text-to-Speech: audio samples, features, plans, pricing, and more. # Live Demo Non-Fiction Fiction News Blog Conversation 0/250 ## Voice Sierra Autumn Melody Hannah Emily Ivy Kaitlyn Luna Willow Lauren Sierra Noah Jasper Caleb Ronan Ethan Daniel Zane Rowan ## Language ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ US English ๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ง UK English ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ณ Mandarin Chinese ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ณ Hindi ๐Ÿ‡ช๐Ÿ‡ธ Spanish ๐Ÿ‡ง๐Ÿ‡ท Portuguese ๐Ÿ‡ฏ๐Ÿ‡ต Japanese ๐Ÿ‡ซ๐Ÿ‡ท French ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡น Italian ## Format Standard MP3 Phone Call PCM ยต-law ## Speed 1.0 ## Pitch ## Bitrate 192k 128k 96k 64k 48k 32k 16k _Synthesize_ Speed 0 s Filesize 0 kb ## [Play.ht](https://play.ht/) Transform written content into high-quality, lifelike voiceovers with AI-powered text-to-speech technology. ## [OpenAI Text-to-Speech](https://platform.openai.com/docs/guides/text-to-speech) Convert text into lifelike spoken audio using one of the six built-in voices. ### Voice Quality #### Play.ht Samples Mean Opinion Score Fiction 4.17 Non-Fiction 4.17 Conversation 3.48 #### OpenAI Text-to-Speech Samples Mean Opinion Score Fiction N/A Non-Fiction N/A Conversation N/A Mean Opinion Score (MOS) is a numerical measure that represents the perceived quality of audio samples, commonly used in evaluating text-to-speech systems. The score ranges from 1 to 5, with 1 indicating poor quality and 5 signifying excellent quality. These scores are derived from comprehensive, professionally-conducted evaluations, and are anonymized to ensure unbiased results. ### Features #### Play.ht Features - Voice Cloning - Multi-lingual - Per-word Timestamps - Pitch Control - Speed Control - Phone Formats (e.g. pcm_mulaw) #### OpenAI Text-to-Speech Features - Voice Cloning - Multi-lingual - Per-word Timestamps - Pitch Control - Speed Control - Phone Formats (e.g. pcm_mulaw) #### Features - Conclusion - **Play.ht** offers a more feature-rich text-to-speech service compared to **OpenAI Text-to-Speech**, including voice cloning, per-word timestamps, and speed control, which are not available with OpenAI's offering. - Additionally, **Play.ht** supports phone formats and provides options for pitch control, further enhancing its versatility for different use cases. - In contrast, OpenAI's service is more basic, lacking these advanced features but still supports multiple languages. ### Pricing & Plans #### Play.ht Pricing - Free $0/mo 12,500 characters - Creator $39/mo 250,000 characters - Unlimited $99/mo 2.5M characters limit #### OpenAI Text-to-Speech Pricing - Pay As You Go $15 per 1M characters Optimized for speed - Pay As You Go (TTS HD) $30 per 1M characters Optimized for quality #### Pricing & Plans - Conclusion - For users just starting out or with minimal text-to-speech needs, **Play.ht** offers an unbeatable value with its Free Plan. - However, when it comes to paid plans, **OpenAI Text-to-Speech** emerges as the more cost-effective option, providing the best value for users at any usage level. - This makes **OpenAI Text-to-Speech** the go-to choice for those seeking affordability without compromising on quality. ### Summary - Considering voice quality, features, and pricing, **Play.ht** stands out for its higher voice quality scores and a broader range of features, including voice cloning and speed control, making it suitable for diverse and specialized needs. - However, **OpenAI Text-to-Speech** offers a more cost-effective solution for users with its straightforward pricing model, despite having fewer features. - Ultimately, the choice between **Play.ht** and **OpenAI Text-to-Speech** depends on the user's specific requirements for voice quality, feature richness, and budget constraints.