# Play.ht vs. Murf API

The best way to compare Play.ht vs. Murf API: audio samples, features, plans, pricing, and more.

# Live Demo

## Voice Options

### Types:
- Non-Fiction
- Fiction
- News
- Blog
- Conversation

### Voice Selection:
- Sierra
- Autumn
- Melody
- Hannah
- Emily
- Ivy
- Kaitlyn
- Luna
- Willow
- Lauren
- Noah
- Jasper
- Caleb
- Ronan
- Ethan
- Daniel
- Zane
- Rowan

### Language Options:
- 🇺🇸 US English
- 🇬🇧 UK English
- 🇨🇳 Mandarin Chinese
- 🇮🇳 Hindi
- 🇪🇸 Spanish
- 🇧🇷 Portuguese
- 🇯🇵 Japanese
- 🇫🇷 French
- 🇮🇹 Italian

### Format Options:
- Standard
- MP3
- Phone Call
- PCM µ-law

### Speed and Quality:
- Speed: 1.0
- Bitrate Options: 192k, 128k, 96k, 64k, 48k, 32k, 16k

## [Play.ht](https://play.ht/)
Transform written content into high-quality, lifelike voiceovers with AI-powered text-to-speech technology.

## [Murf API](https://murf.ai/text-to-speech-api)
Deploy high-quality voices for your apps, website, and other services at scale.

### Voice Quality

#### Play.ht Samples
- Mean Opinion Score:
  - Fiction: 4.17
  - Non-Fiction: 4.17
  - Conversation: 3.48

#### Murf API Samples
- Mean Opinion Score:
  - Fiction: N/A
  - Non-Fiction: N/A
  - Conversation: N/A
  
Mean Opinion Score (MOS) is a numerical measure that represents the perceived quality of audio samples, commonly used in evaluating text-to-speech systems. The score ranges from 1 to 5, with 1 indicating poor quality and 5 signifying excellent quality.

### Features

#### Play.ht Features
- Voice Cloning
- Multi-lingual
- Per-word Timestamps
- Pitch Control
- Speed Control
- Phone Formats (e.g. pcm_mulaw)

#### Murf API Features
- Voice Cloning
- Multi-lingual
- Per-word Timestamps
- Pitch Control
- Speed Control
- Phone Formats (e.g. pcm_mulaw)

### Features - Conclusion
- Both **Play.ht** and **Murf API** offer a range of features catering to diverse text-to-speech needs, including voice cloning, multi-lingual support, speed control, and compatibility with phone formats.
- **Play.ht** distinguishes itself with per-word timestamps, a feature not available in **Murf API**, while **Murf API** offers pitch control, which is absent in **Play.ht**.

### Pricing & Plans

#### Play.ht Pricing
- Free: $0/mo (12,500 characters)
- Creator: $39/mo (250,000 characters)
- Unlimited: $99/mo (2.5M characters limit)

#### Murf API Pricing
- API Subscription: $3000/year (12M characters per year)

### Pricing & Plans - Conclusion
- In a pricing comparison between **Play.ht** and **Murf API**, **Play.ht** offers more competitive and flexible pricing plans suitable for a range of usage levels.
- **Murf API** provides a straightforward annual plan that may appeal to users with consistent high-volume needs, but at a higher cost.

### Customer Reviews

#### Play.ht Reviews
- Rating: 4.6 out of 5
- Average of 293 ratings from leading review sites.

**Play.ht** is highly praised for its diverse and realistic voice options, ease of use, and excellent customer support. Issues noted include:
- Natural inflection struggles with complex terms.
- Concerns about pricing structure and technical glitches.

#### Murf API Reviews
- Rating: 3.8 out of 5
- Average of 819 ratings from leading review sites.

**Murf API** generally receives praise for its variety of natural-sounding voices but faces criticism regarding:
- Pricing model being too expensive.
- Customer service and transparency issues with free trials.

### Summary
- **Play.ht** and **Murf API** both offer robust text-to-speech services with unique strengths.
- **Play.ht** stands out for its competitive pricing and specialized features like per-word timestamps.
- **Murf API** appeals to users with specific voice modulation needs, despite its higher cost.