# Amazon Polly vs. OpenAI Text-to-Speech

The best way to compare Amazon Polly vs. OpenAI Text-to-Speech: audio samples, features, plans, pricing, and more.

# Live Demo

Non-Fiction

Fiction

News

Blog

Conversation

0/250

Voice

Sierra

Autumn

Melody

Hannah

Emily

Ivy

Kaitlyn

Luna

Willow

Lauren

Sierra

Noah

Jasper

Caleb

Ronan

Ethan

Daniel

Zane

Rowan

Language

🇺🇸 US English

🇺🇸 US English

🇬🇧 UK English

🇨🇳 Mandarin Chinese

🇮🇳 Hindi

🇪🇸 Spanish

🇧🇷 Portuguese

🇯🇵 Japanese

🇫🇷 French

🇮🇹 Italian

Format

Standard

Standard

MP3

Phone Call

PCM µ-law

Normal

Speed

1.0

Pitch

Bitrate

192k

192k

128k

96k

64k

48k

32k

16k

_Synthesize_

Speed

0 s

Filesize

0 kb

## [Amazon Polly](https://aws.amazon.com/polly/)

Text-to-speech service to transform text into natural-sounding speech using deep learning technologies.

## [OpenAI Text-to-Speech](https://platform.openai.com/docs/guides/text-to-speech)

Convert text into lifelike spoken audio using one of the six built-in voices.

### Voice Quality

#### Amazon Polly Samples

Mean Opinion Score

Fiction

3.00

Non-Fiction

2.51

Conversation

2.63

#### OpenAI Text-to-Speech Samples

Mean Opinion Score

Fiction

N/A

Non-Fiction

N/A

Conversation

N/A

Mean Opinion Score (MOS) is a numerical measure that represents the perceived quality of audio samples, commonly used in evaluating text-to-speech systems.

The score ranges from 1 to 5, with 1 indicating poor quality and 5 signifying excellent quality.

These scores are derived from comprehensive, professionally-conducted evaluations, and are anonymized to ensure unbiased results.

### Features

#### Amazon Polly Features

Voice Cloning

Multi-lingual

Per-word Timestamps

Pitch Control

Speed Control

Phone Formats (e.g. pcm_mulaw)

#### OpenAI Text-to-Speech Features

Voice Cloning

Multi-lingual

Per-word Timestamps

Pitch Control

Speed Control

Phone Formats (e.g. pcm_mulaw)

#### Features - Conclusion

- **Amazon Polly** offers a more feature-rich text-to-speech service compared to **OpenAI Text-to-Speech**, including capabilities such as voice cloning, per-word timestamps, pitch control, speed control, and support for phone formats.
- **OpenAI Text-to-Speech**, on the other hand, has a more limited feature set, lacking in these advanced options.
- This makes **Amazon Polly** a more versatile choice for users needing detailed customization and control over their text-to-speech outputs.

### Pricing & Plans

#### Amazon Polly Pricing

Free

$0/mo

1M characters (for first 12 months only)

Pay As You Go

$16per

1M characters

#### OpenAI Text-to-Speech Pricing

Pay As You Go

$15per

1M characters

Optimized for speed

Pay As You Go (TTS HD)

$30per

1M characters

Optimized for quality

#### Pricing & Plans - Conclusion

- **Amazon Polly** offers an attractive starting point for new users with its free tier for the first 12 months, making it ideal for those testing the waters or with minimal text-to-speech needs.
- However, for long-term or high-volume users, **OpenAI Text-to-Speech** edges out as the more cost-effective option, lacking a free tier but maintaining a slightly lower ongoing cost.
- Ultimately, the choice between the two services hinges on the user's specific needs and usage patterns, with **Amazon Polly** favoring initial use and **OpenAI Text-to-Speech** benefiting sustained, heavier use.

### Summary

- In comparing **Amazon Polly** and **OpenAI Text-to-Speech**, **Amazon Polly** stands out with its richer feature set, including voice customization options and a free tier for new users, making it particularly appealing for those seeking detailed control and cost-effective entry points.
- However, **OpenAI Text-to-Speech** offers a slightly more affordable long-term pricing model, despite its more limited features and lack of voice quality data.
- Ultimately, the choice between the two depends on the user's priorities, whether they value advanced features and initial cost savings with **Amazon Polly** or prefer the slightly lower ongoing costs associated with **OpenAI Text-to-Speech**.
