Amazon Polly vs. Murf API

The best way to compare Amazon Polly vs. Murf API: audio samples, features, plans, pricing, and more.

Live Demo

Non-Fiction

Fiction

News

Blog

Conversation

0/250

Voice

Sierra

Autumn

Melody

Hannah

Emily

Ivy

Kaitlyn

Luna

Willow

Lauren

Sierra

Noah

Jasper

Caleb

Ronan

Ethan

Daniel

Zane

Rowan

Language

🇺🇸 US English

🇺🇸 US English

🇬🇧 UK English

🇨🇳 Mandarin Chinese

🇮🇳 Hindi

🇪🇸 Spanish

🇧🇷 Portuguese

🇯🇵 Japanese

🇫🇷 French

🇮🇹 Italian

Format

Standard

Standard

MP3

Phone Call

PCM µ-law

Normal

Speed

1.0

Pitch

Bitrate

192k

192k

128k

96k

64k

48k

32k

16k

Synthesize

Speed

0 s

Filesize

0 kb

Amazon Polly

Text-to-speech service to transform text into natural-sounding speech using deep learning technologies.

Murf API

Deploy high quality voices for your apps, website and other services at scale.

Voice Quality

Amazon Polly Samples

Mean Opinion Score

Fiction

3.00

Non-Fiction

2.51

Conversation

2.63

Murf API Samples

Mean Opinion Score

Fiction

N/A

Non-Fiction

N/A

Conversation

N/A

Mean Opinion Score (MOS) is a numerical measure that represents the perceived quality of audio samples, commonly used in evaluating text-to-speech systems. The score ranges from 1 to 5, with 1 indicating poor quality and 5 signifying excellent quality. These scores are derived from comprehensive, professionally-conducted evaluations, and are anonymized to ensure unbiased results.

Features

Amazon Polly Features

  • Voice Cloning
  • Multi-lingual
  • Per-word Timestamps
  • Pitch Control
  • Speed Control
  • Phone Formats (e.g. pcm_mulaw)

Murf API Features

  • Voice Cloning
  • Multi-lingual
  • Per-word Timestamps
  • Pitch Control
  • Speed Control
  • Phone Formats (e.g. pcm_mulaw)

Features - Conclusion

  • Amazon Polly and Murf API both offer multi-lingual support, pitch and speed control, and support for phone formats like pcm_mulaw, catering to a wide range of text-to-speech needs.
  • However, Murf API distinguishes itself with the capability for voice cloning, a feature not available in Amazon Polly, potentially offering a more personalized experience for users.
  • On the other hand, Amazon Polly provides per-word timestamps, which could be crucial for applications requiring precise synchronization between text and speech.

Pricing & Plans

Amazon Polly Pricing

  • Free
  • $0/mo
  • 1M characters (for first 12 months only)
  • Pay As You Go
  • $16 per 1M characters

Murf API Pricing

  • API Subscription
  • $3000/year
  • 12M characters (per year)

Pricing & Plans - Conclusion

  • Amazon Polly emerges as the more cost-effective option for both new users and those with ongoing text-to-speech needs, offering a free tier for the first 12 months and a competitive Pay As You Go rate thereafter.
  • In contrast, Murf API, with its annual subscription model, presents a higher cost per million characters, making it less economical for users prioritizing budget.
  • However, for users with specific needs that justify the expense, such as voice cloning, Murf API's pricing may be considered reasonable.

Customer Reviews

Amazon Polly Reviews

4.4 out of 5

Average of 68 ratings from leading review sites.

Customers appreciate Amazon Polly for its natural-sounding voices, ease of use, and integration with AWS services. They find it beneficial for various applications like IVR systems, content creation, and multilingual support. However, concerns about cost, limited customization options, and occasional unnatural inflections in the voices are common. The service's scalability and fast response times are highlighted as significant advantages, helping businesses efficiently manage large-scale projects.

  • Ease of use
  • Natural-sounding voices
  • Integration with AWS
  • Scalability
  • Voice inflection
  • Cost
  • Customization options

Murf API Reviews

3.8 out of 5

Average of 819 ratings from leading review sites.

Murf API generally receives praise for its variety of natural-sounding voices, user-friendly interface, and quick setup, making it a popular choice for voiceover projects. Customers appreciate the diverse voice options and the ability to customize speech patterns. However, there are significant concerns about the pricing model, which many find too expensive and restrictive in terms of voice generation limits. Additionally, there are complaints about customer service and misleading information regarding free trials and subscriptions. Issues with billing practices and refund policies are also frequently mentioned, causing distrust among some users.

  • Voice quality
  • User interface
  • Setup
  • Voice variety
  • Customization
  • Pricing
  • Customer service
  • Billing practices
  • Refund policy

Summary

  • In comparing Amazon Polly and Murf API for text-to-speech services, Amazon Polly offers a more cost-effective solution with competitive pricing and a free tier, alongside decent voice quality scores and a range of features including per-word timestamps and multi-lingual support.
  • Murf API, while more expensive, distinguishes itself with the unique feature of voice cloning and also supports multi-lingual capabilities, pitch, and speed control.
  • Ultimately, the choice between the two depends on specific user needs, with Amazon Polly appealing to those prioritizing budget and basic features, and Murf API catering to users requiring advanced features like voice cloning.